Oz Election Forums (ozforums.com.au)

Australia Decides

You are not logged in.

#1 2007-07-16 03:06:39

rafyMP
Moderator
Registered: 2007-06-14
Posts: 536

Acnielsen - 58/42 TPP (16 July 2007)

Acnielsen - 58/42 TPP

Primaries - Coalition 39, Labor 49, Greens 7, Other 6.

Sample size: 1412
Survey dates: 12 - 14 July 2007

http://www.theage.com.au/ffxmedia/2007/ … 07POLL.jpg

Last edited by rafyMP (2007-07-16 03:11:54)


http://www.ozforums.com.au/uploads/21_l9566609817_466.png

Offline

 

#2 2007-07-16 03:08:51

Dario
Member
Registered: 2007-07-02
Posts: 568

Re: Acnielsen - 58/42 TPP (16 July 2007)

Wow. The QLD numbers are a bit wierd...

Last edited by Dario (2007-07-16 03:17:45)

Offline

 

#3 2007-07-16 03:26:25

Kapunda
Member
Registered: 2007-06-17
Posts: 72

Re: Acnielsen - 58/42 TPP (16 July 2007)

Howard's time is up. When the electorate decide its time for a clean out they usually reach for a broad brush. Many people have been waiting for the goodship SS Coalition to right herself from her list, but this ship isn't coming back. The worst bit is yet to come for the government though. Something to do with abandoning ship and every man for himself. When it comes to political survival some will turn on their own just to keep themselves afloat. It won't be pretty.

Offline

 

#4 2007-07-16 04:07:32

KIna
Member
Registered: 2007-06-15
Posts: 1235

Re: Acnielsen - 58/42 TPP (16 July 2007)

The breakdown only gives me confusion given the data of the almagamated Newspolls.


Liberal National Party - Workchoices forever
Howard - Costello - Turnbull: failed negligent economic managers.

Offline

 

#5 2007-07-16 04:12:55

Kapunda
Member
Registered: 2007-06-17
Posts: 72

Re: Acnielsen - 58/42 TPP (16 July 2007)

From the 'The Age"
"while the Queensland figure (48 to 52) appears, according to Mr Stirton, to be an aberration due to small sample size, because his home state has previously been polling strongly for Mr Rudd."

Refreshing to hear a pollster be so frank. Every other poll this year has found the ALP with a strong lead in QLD.

Offline

 

#6 2007-07-16 05:07:20

KIna
Member
Registered: 2007-06-15
Posts: 1235

Re: Acnielsen - 58/42 TPP (16 July 2007)

Actually in conjunction with the Newspoll trend the QLD result is obviously an abberation as probably is the Victorian number. This raises the possibility that it is even worse than it seems which is already terrible.

We see another hard-right person gain pre-selection in a safe Liberal seat which further pushes the Party to the hard right. This has to be terribly distressing for the others who see their party becoming irrelevant just when it looks like they will lose an election. If the Liberals become even more extreme right they will make themselves unelectable in the future.

Given that they are basically done for now - SHOULD there be a split in the Liberal Party? The non-extreme right brake away to form their own party - to escape the madness?

I hate to think the sort of Australia the future Liberal party would create.


Liberal National Party - Workchoices forever
Howard - Costello - Turnbull: failed negligent economic managers.

Offline

 

#7 2007-07-16 06:34:09

Tobe
Member
Registered: 2007-06-17
Posts: 1347

Re: Acnielsen - 58/42 TPP (16 July 2007)

We can finally assume Howard is the underdog, and for all the MSM saying he does well fighting out of a corner, being the underdog is not quite the same thing, and doesn’t suit him at all. It is almost over. I notice the online RW brigade is now almost impossible to find.

Howard can take a lot of the credit for pushing the Liberals to the right. Didn't the Brogden stuff come out of his office?

Offline

 

#8 2007-07-16 11:14:45

Rx
Member
Registered: 2007-06-27
Posts: 562

Re: Acnielsen - 58/42 TPP (16 July 2007)

Yes, well maybe a split of the Liberal Party would be in order. They could keep the moderates and the small l's in a group called the "Liberal Party".

The reactionary nascent Fascists (the Howard, Costello, Abbott, Andrews etc mob) could split and form - hmmm, what would they call it - the New Guard.

Truth in labeling!


Australia Chose Against WorkChoices

http://ozforums.com.au/uploads/thumbs/81_workchoices.gif

Offline

 

#9 2007-07-16 12:07:54

Geoff
Member
Registered: 2007-06-27
Posts: 19

Re: Acnielsen - 58/42 TPP (16 July 2007)

Either way, the right wing have won. A Rudd govt. will be further right in economic and many social issues than any '80's Lib. govt. would have dreamed. Rudd to quarantine Welfare payments? Rudd to relax border security?

Fools gold folks.

Offline

 

#10 2007-07-16 13:09:46

Tobe
Member
Registered: 2007-06-17
Posts: 1347

Re: Acnielsen - 58/42 TPP (16 July 2007)

I take your point Geoff, but that's politics. Remember in opposition Howard had to pretend to like universal health care. He has never really attacked it, just used stagnant bulk billing rates to make the whole system rot.

If Rudd starts using things like border security as a political wedge after he is in power then I will agree he is the same as Howard. But in power the Labor party has other wedges, such as the republic, to work with.

Personally I think wedging conservatives with things like the republic is better than vilifying boat people. Howard's wedges are beginning to lose their bite, which is part of the reason he is losing it. I don't think Rudd will want to continue promoting such tired old politics. At the moment Rudd needs to assure people, in government he will have more scope to set the agenda.

I doubt he will want to continue “Howard’s way”, which I expect will be copping quite a bit of stick once he’s gone.

Offline

 

#11 2007-07-16 13:27:47

Bam
Moderator
From: Division of Hotham
Registered: 2007-06-19
Posts: 1375

Re: Acnielsen - 58/42 TPP (16 July 2007)

No doubt about it, the Liberal Party need a clean-out and a purge of all the extreme right-wing that have infiltrated the party. While the Liberals have held the centre-right ground, they have been electable. With the drift of the Liberal Party to the right, they have abandoned the centre ground, which is where most of the swinging voters lie. Now the ALP have claimed the centre for themselves. This is the pendulum of Australian politics at work.

The ALP will drift back to the left after the election. It might take six weeks or six years, but it will happen eventually. There's nothing wrong with that because the country needs to drift back to the left. After a decade of unrelenting attacks on employee unions but constant pandering to employer unions, the policy balance in this country is seriously out of whack. The balance needs to be restored and the polls reflect this. The winds of change are a howling gale and come November there will be a change of government in Australia.

Why has the public mood drifted in this way? The Government have abused their Senate majority. Governments that do this inevitably do badly at the next election. It happened to Chifley in 1949, and it will happen to Howard in 2007. In addition, there is a growing discontent among the electorate. When Howard is claiming that we've never had it so good but large numbers of people are losing their homes to wage cuts and interest rates rises, it is not surprising that there is a growing discontent among the electorate. The Coalition cannot patch things up in a few months. Even if they did repeal Workchoices and cut interest rates by 1% before the election, that would only restore the status quo of 2004. In addition, there are things that cannot be undone, such as police investigations against sitting Liberal members and a vast legacy of broken promises.

So who do we trust? Not them any more.


Between 1999 and 2004 there was no investment in Australia, it all went into housing and consumption all borrowed on the current account. When Peter Costello runs around saying, "Oh we've paid off the debt," it's like the pea and thimble trick. The Government debt or the massive private debt abroad? It's continuing to grow.
-- Paul Keating, 7:30 Report interview, May 8, 2006

Offline

 

#12 2007-07-16 14:44:50

smokey
Senior Stirrer
From: Eastern Suburbs, Sydney
Registered: 2007-06-14
Posts: 3278

Re: Acnielsen - 58/42 TPP (16 July 2007)

It's been a drift to the far right and the arrogance that comes from being too long in power and not listening to voters, that we are now seeing the demise of Howard and his sad bunch of cohorts.

Every attempt by them now to stem the tide is just another reminder of their arrogance. Had to laugh at the new WC's add on telly last night, saying that evidently it's a myth that workers are on their own. People know that's a lie because they've seen what's happened to them in their own lives. And there we have this add telling them what they've experienced isn't true FFS. I can't imagine a more stark example of a gov being out of touch.

But it's worse that just being out of touch. They preach their own lines from Abbot's parallel universe and expect us to follow, sacrificing our future and our financial security for their ideology. They've failed, and they'll never succeed now. But they're so full of themselves they can't even see their own mistakes. Like a bunch of zealots who think they have "the truth" and all they have to do is spread the message to save us all.

Australia is rejecting their "truth" as the far right radicalism that it is.

Offline

 

#13 2007-07-16 14:51:37

Aristotle
Member
Registered: 2007-06-14
Posts: 1179

Re: Acnielsen - 58/42 TPP (16 July 2007)

Tobe, I sincerely hope that the era of wedge politics will be over, and that the Liberal Party will return to what it is, a party of liberals, not a collection of right wing hangers-on who take their political instruction from the U.S. Republican Party Handbook, edited by Karl Rove.

It's a disgrace where this party has ended up, and a good clean out will be the best thing for it to re-establish its true identity.

Offline

 

#14 2007-07-16 15:00:23

Fagin
Member
From: Wagga Wagga, NSW.
Registered: 2007-07-13
Posts: 1346
Website

Re: Acnielsen - 58/42 TPP (16 July 2007)

The Liberal party return to its roots? Not likely with the recent pre-selections of right-wing hard-heads Alex Hawke and Michael Towke. Abbott's chances of being leader of the party increase each time a neo-con is pre-selected.

The Libs need a good old-fashioned split.

Offline

 

#15 2007-07-16 15:29:44

Nhullunbuy
Member
Registered: 2007-06-28
Posts: 214

Re: Acnielsen - 58/42 TPP (16 July 2007)

Should Labor win and not have control of the Senate what is the likelihood of the Senate blocking Labor's changes to WorkChoices legislation? And a double-dissolution?


Australian media - some of the worst in the western world.

Offline

 

#16 2007-07-16 15:53:56

Geoff
Member
Registered: 2007-06-27
Posts: 19

Re: Acnielsen - 58/42 TPP (16 July 2007)

Nhullunbuy, a good question. If the senate blocks WC reform Rudds #1 policy goes no-where. Would he compromise? So far he has with the building industry watchdog, and waivered on AWA's for some. Maybe he will take Keatings advice and legislate basic work standards and let AWA's stand "whatever you want to call them. Single enterprise workplace agreements."(LaTELINE 7/6.) under corporations law.

A double dissolution would sharpen the debate tho.

Offline

 

#17 2007-07-16 16:02:27

Nhullunbuy
Member
Registered: 2007-06-28
Posts: 214

Re: Acnielsen - 58/42 TPP (16 July 2007)

IS ABBOTT A MORON?

Tony Abbott is unable to fathom why everyone hates them since they are such a good government. It is hard to know if he is being genuine here or not.

He thinks they have been a good government? On what grounds?

Let me tell you Mr Abbott the reality not political spin. Your government has been terrible and drags Australia down.

1. We know the strength of the economy comes form Hawke/Keating reforms and the global/China booms. It basically works on auto-pilot. The only credit Costello can take for the economy is not palying with it too much. The Government's Economic credentials should be compared to that of a good Book-keeper. Yes you bought in GST, sold off Telstra [was that good?]

2. You treated democracy, accountability and honesty as dirty things and treated the Australian people with total disrespect in:
(i) Lying us into Iraq - to help out a personal mate 
(ii) Keep us in Iraq to help out a personal mate
(iii) Using Justice as a poltical foreign policy toy by allowing Hicks to rot for 5 years
(iv) Turning a blind eye to the terrible torture of Habib [would you like have allyour fingernails pulled out tony?] (v) AWB bribery - we all know that Ministers MUST have known all about this - it is joke to deny it. Yet the Ministers having relative responsibility were not punished. In fact we have Downer laughing it off before the Cole inquiry. The govt thought because no one could come out and say they were corrupt on this that it made it ok. (vi) Tamapa raid - in using the military services as a political election toy you corrupt them as well as govt.
(vii) Baby Overboard - you people deliberately lied to the public just to win votes. Again the govt corrupts democracy, accountablility and uses the military as political election toy.
(vii) Manildra - this story defys credibility.
(vii) Cash for visas
(viii) Detention and deportation of Australian citizens by a rabid immigration dept spurred on by the desires of the govt.
(ix) Using racism, xenophobia, bigotry, intolerance as tools to win votes or rush in draconian laws.
(X) Dropping WorkChoices on Australians without a mandate and thus deliberately that creates a totally powerless workforce for the entire benefit of big business. Putting big business mates before the people of Australia who elect you to protect their interests not abuse them.
(xi) Adopting a disgusting form of Wedge Politics and viscious mud slinging similar to the USA model thus dirtying our democracy.
(xii) Adopting an aggressive intolerant and abusive form of governing. Each policy comes with threat and intimidation, esepecially when it comes to other states.
(xiii) Treating FOI as a joke and thus the Australian people with arrogance.
(xiv) Totally politicising the Public Service so much so that it sees itself as tool to keep the government elected.
(xv) Politicising the military and security services.
(xvi) Villifying and vicisously victimising any person or group who has an opposing view and also whistleblowers. AKA the character assasinstion of Justice Kirby on fake documents under Parliamentary privildge. The Red Cross, RSPCA, scientists on Climate Change, the whistlblower on Airport security, the reporters who would not divulge sources and a litany of other abuses in order to CREATE FEAR among the public service, non-govt organisations and the like - so there would be no voices disagreeing with the govts view.
(x) Abusing the processes of the House Of Reps, The Senate in order to reduce govt accountablility.
(xi) Handing over Australia's foreign policy to the USA
(xii) Making bizare defence purchases that inhibt our capabilities and can only cause suspicion as to reasons.

AND Mr Abbott we also know that
1. you intend to put another 1.5 million on AWAs next year
2. That you intend to force all Australians onto AWAs in the long term
3. You intend to make further more draconian WorkChoices legislation - akak Minchin 2006 address to Nicholls.
4. That it is your intention to destroy unions - which have been declared a fundamental human right in many countries.

SO Mr Abbott - you have been a good government? I think you mean to say the economy has been good for many years and you happened to be the government in power at the time. Yet it is Hawke Keating who set it up and China and the world that has pushed it along.

That you lot have been sleeping is proven by all the things the coming of Kevin Rudd has forced you to do.

This totally blindness as to what you are proves you should all be voted out.

Last edited by Nhullunbuy (2007-07-16 18:19:27)


Australian media - some of the worst in the western world.

Offline

 

#18 2007-07-16 16:31:31

Bam
Moderator
From: Division of Hotham
Registered: 2007-06-19
Posts: 1375

Re: Acnielsen - 58/42 TPP (16 July 2007)

Nhullunbuy wrote:

This totally blindness as to what you are proves you should all be voted out.

In all 88 seats that they currently hold? I would like to see that wink


Between 1999 and 2004 there was no investment in Australia, it all went into housing and consumption all borrowed on the current account. When Peter Costello runs around saying, "Oh we've paid off the debt," it's like the pea and thimble trick. The Government debt or the massive private debt abroad? It's continuing to grow.
-- Paul Keating, 7:30 Report interview, May 8, 2006

Offline

 

#19 2007-07-16 17:06:07

Aristotle
Member
Registered: 2007-06-14
Posts: 1179

Re: Acnielsen - 58/42 TPP (16 July 2007)

Fagin wrote:

The Liberal party return to its roots? Not likely with the recent pre-selections of right-wing hard-heads Alex Hawke and Michael Towke. Abbott's chances of being leader of the party increase each time a neo-con is pre-selected.

I hope you are wrong Fagin, but sadly, I suspect you may be right.

Offline

 

#20 2007-07-16 17:56:03

2353
Member
From: Brisvegas
Registered: 2007-06-20
Posts: 1227

Re: Acnielsen - 58/42 TPP (16 July 2007)

Here's a thought.

The Liberal Party steers hard right under Abbott & Costello(if he survives)
The ALP picks up the small 'l' Liberals and the "right wing" of labor
The Greens picks up the "left wing" of labor and retains most of their current members

The Liberal Party dies a death that is similar to the DLP & One Nation
The ALP becomes Australia's "conservative" party
The Greens become the "progressive" party

Elections inside of 20 years become a battle between the ALP & the Greens.


Should you use a hyphen when writing anal retentive?

RIP Pete.

Offline

 

#21 2007-07-16 18:07:05

jasmineAnadyr
Member
Registered: 2007-07-02
Posts: 147

Re: Acnielsen - 58/42 TPP (16 July 2007)

Not entirely unreasonable 2353.

Offline

 

#22 2007-07-16 18:08:13

Vince
Member
Registered: 2007-07-12
Posts: 269

Re: Acnielsen - 58/42 TPP (16 July 2007)

Tony Abbott needs to look at the Iraq involvement question in the latest Acnielsen poll.
TPP is reflected in the results of this question.
We might have a rerun of 72 with the election running and the troops withdrawing.


Thanks for the wonderful forum.

Last edited by Vince (2007-07-16 18:10:51)

Offline

 

#23 2007-07-16 22:03:38

AML
Member
From: Liechhardt
Registered: 2007-06-18
Posts: 69

Re: Acnielsen - 58/42 TPP (16 July 2007)

The ALP becomes Australia's "conservative" party
The Greens become the "progressive" party

Elections inside of 20 years become a battle between the ALP & the Greens.

This would require the ALP losing it's left faction and thinking, and while it's not prevalent in the public eye, the ALP left is still alive and strong at the local level. Their thinking is very similar to the greens, focused on social policy and bereft on economic policy which is generally the domian of the right (in my experience of inner city Sydney anyway)

IMO, the reason The Greens have been so successful in recent years is they have followed the logic that not being a major party, they don't need to have responsible or electable economic policies. Until they have solid economic policies, they will never have the electoral support required to be a credible opposition beyond the <30 yo demographic. It goes with the old saying, if you're not a socialist at 20, you have no heart, and if you're not a capitalist by 30, you have no brain....

I reckon a Lib split, whether litterally or idealogically, is more likely and more electrally palatable for their survival.


Australia is a lucky country, run by second rate people who share it's luck.

Offline

 

#24 2007-07-16 23:18:39

KIna
Member
Registered: 2007-06-15
Posts: 1235

Re: Acnielsen - 58/42 TPP (16 July 2007)

They could probably make up five new parties:
Autocratic Liberal Party
Facist Liberal Party 
Traditional Liberal Party
Spite and Malice Liberal Party
No Union Bosses Liberal Party


Liberal National Party - Workchoices forever
Howard - Costello - Turnbull: failed negligent economic managers.

Offline

 

#25 2007-07-16 23:26:11

Amber Dekstris
Member
Registered: 2007-06-14
Posts: 1228

Re: Acnielsen - 58/42 TPP (16 July 2007)

The Liberal Party won't split, I don't think. They'll suffer a defeat, wander around in the wilderness for a while wondering how could this have happened when everyone was doing so well, eventually come to the realisation that in fact not everyone was doing well, draft some new policies that reflect that change in emphasis, find a new leader that embodies it, and defeat Labor in 2016.

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
© Copyright 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson